[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#690836: marked as done (unblock: fcitx/4.2.4.2-1)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:06:05 +0100
with message-id <1365865565.4627.42.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#690836: partial review of unblock: fcitx/4.2.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690836,
regarding unblock: fcitx/4.2.4.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690836: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690836
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

This is a new upstream bug fix release for 4.2.4.x stable branch. This
branch is established with the intention of being included in Debian
Wheezy. 4.2.4.2 comes with all the changes we have already applied to
4.2.4.1 tree, as well as a series of error handling enhancements and
bug fixes in the GTK IM Modules. The debdiff is filled with noises, so
a diff of the actual code change is also attached.



-- 
Regards,
Aron Xu

Attachment: fcitx_4.2.4.2-1.debdiff
Description: Binary data

Attachment: code.diff
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 03:32 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote:
> > - I suggest explaining in more detail why this version of the package
> >   deserves a freeze exception [2]. I don't see any RC or important bugs
> >   fixed, or release goals achieved, so I DON'T expect the RT to grant
> >   the unblock.
> 
> This unblock was filed on 18 Oct 2012, at that time freeze wasn't that
> deep yet.

Your original mail also never made it to -release, most likely due to
the size of the diff.

Apologies for not having to back to you sooner, but looking at the
current state of the package I noticed that unstable now has 4.2.7-2
with a huge debdiff. I'm afraid we can't really look at migrating that
package at this point.

If there are fixes that you believe are important enough to be fixed
still but aren't filed as RC bugs for whatever reason, please let us
know.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: