On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 08:33:00 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I have no idea how hard the handling of testing-proposed-uploads might > be for the release team. So I could imagine an alternative plan to > unblock 5.1.12b.dfsg-2 which has admittedly more changes than acceptable > in freeze time (sorry, I did not realised this problem in July last year > - that's my fault) but all in all enabling hardening should not cause > real trouble. In case release team might consider the later plan I'd > volunteer to create the necessary diffs for an unblock request - just > tell me what plan you prefer and I will do this. > No, we won't add hardening at this stage. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature