Bug#702465: marked as done (RM: tty-clock/1.1-1)
Your message dated Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:53:28 +0200
with message-id <515DA1F8.7070600@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#702465: RM: tty-clock/1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #702465,
regarding RM: tty-clock/1.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
702465: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702465
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: RM: tty-clock/1.1-1
- From: Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:45:45 -0500
- Message-id: <CANTw=MO2kZem8rv0OHNgrtedkBsopS0dcR=T0EXk9a10vsrvDg@mail.gmail.com>
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove tty-clock. It's got lots of issues that aren't really
being worked on (bug #700738). It also has no reverse-dependencies
and has yet to be included in a stable release.
Thanks,
Mike
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org>, 702465-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#702465: RM: tty-clock/1.1-1
- From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:53:28 +0200
- Message-id: <515DA1F8.7070600@thykier.net>
- In-reply-to: <CANTw=MNnGYtwoB+OzMHM4nrgCaBR3YeZ=JJ5U=Uf3wR4vFq=XA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CANTw=MO2kZem8rv0OHNgrtedkBsopS0dcR=T0EXk9a10vsrvDg@mail.gmail.com> <20130306223348.GE5712@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net> <87lia0uovs.fsf@marcos.orangeseeds.org> <CANTw=MOr0i8h3MBiETiSZMdA9OSqi74aQuwZF07+Z-ha4JKMYA@mail.gmail.com> <CANTw=MN55RvcqwZfJGqsOWNHaidZHT0vLn_ir5-SejeyNUnQaA@mail.gmail.com> <CANTw=MNnGYtwoB+OzMHM4nrgCaBR3YeZ=JJ5U=Uf3wR4vFq=XA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2013-03-16 21:25, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Anyway, assuming things get figured out and fixed in a timely manner,
>> this removal request can happily go away.
>
> My opinion is that things aren't moving fast enough. Some fixes were
> uploaded (only) to experimental and new issues with how the code was
> written keep being noticed in that bug report...
>
> I think tty-clock should be removed at this point.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
>
Bug was fixed in experimental and has been downgraded by the maintainer.
The package is apparently working for quite some users because its
popcon has increasing (for quite a while)[1].
So, NACK on removal in Wheezy.
~Niels
[1] Despite relying on "undefined behaviour" extensively.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: