[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#704099: marked as done (RM: php-sabredav/1.6.2-3)

Your message dated Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:39:51 +0000
with message-id <1364420391.22071.12.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#704099: RM: php-sabredav/1.6.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #704099,
regarding RM: php-sabredav/1.6.2-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
704099: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704099
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-CC: php-sabredav@packages.debian.org

Dear release team,

Please, remove php-sabredav from Wheezy, nothings depends on it anymore,
and the 1.6 branch should die in a few months.

Le 26/03/2013 13:41, Diederik de Haas a écrit :
> On Tuesday 26 March 2013 16:04:03 David Prévot wrote:

>> […] I wonder if we should keep php-sabredav in Wheezy: it
>> was packaged to be used as an owncloud dependency, and thus will be
>> useless for that purpose. Furthermore, I’m not sure anyone is interested
>> to maintain php-sabredav 1.6 during Wheezy’s lifetime, so is it OK to
>> ask the release team for a removal from testing?
> 
> I think we should drop sabredav 1.6 for Wheezy for the following 2 reasons:
> 1. sabredav 1.6 will be EOL in november 2013 [1]
> 2. My 'feeling' after the discussion with the the sabredav maintainer [2]
> 
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/sabredav/wiki/Installation
> [2] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sabredav-discuss/_8FE7fr3KVw

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-owncloud-maintainers/Week-of-Mon-20130325/000472.html

Le 27/03/2013 15:25, Evert Pot a écrit :
> Le 27/03/2013 15:07, David Prévot a écrit :
>> […] we are considering removing it from
>> Wheezy before it becomes stable (since it will be difficult for us to
>> maintain the 1.6.2 version in the next few years).
> 
> Not having to maintain it for 3 years sounds like a good thing to me too :)

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-owncloud-maintainers/Week-of-Mon-20130325/000477.html

Regards

David

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=W0/z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 17:19 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Please, remove php-sabredav from Wheezy, nothings depends on it anymore,
> and the 1.6 branch should die in a few months.
[...]
> Le 27/03/2013 15:25, Evert Pot a écrit :
> > Le 27/03/2013 15:07, David Prévot a écrit :
> >> […] we are considering removing it from
> >> Wheezy before it becomes stable (since it will be difficult for us to
> >> maintain the 1.6.2 version in the next few years).
> > 
> > Not having to maintain it for 3 years sounds like a good thing to me too :)

Removal hint added.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: