[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#704017: marked as done (unblock: cpufreqd/2.4.2-2)



Your message dated Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:52:25 +0000
with message-id <1364334745.11811.3.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#704017: unblock: cpufreqd/2.4.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #704017,
regarding unblock: cpufreqd/2.4.2-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
704017: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704017
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package cpufreqd

Message-ID: <[🔎] 1364160589.24071.38.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
> On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 11:29 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > cpufreqd is in a relatively bad shape, unfortunately I haven't been able
> > take care of it as I should have in quite some time.
> > One bug seems particularly bad (severity is important at the moment):
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619913
> > The patch is simple, the patch has been in use for some time, debdiff is
> > attached. Can this fix go to wheezy?
>
> Please go ahead; thanks.

unblock cpufreqd/2.4.2-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.7.0+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-- 
mattia
:wq!
diff -Nru cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/changelog cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/changelog
--- cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/changelog	2010-04-18 23:13:27.000000000 +0900
+++ cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/changelog	2013-03-23 21:51:28.000000000 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cpufreqd (2.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Fix reading the correct battery attribute
+    (Closes: #619913 and Closes: #644567).
+
+ -- Mattia Dongili <malattia@debian.org>  Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:42:31 +0900
+
 cpufreqd (2.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release: fixes configuration with libsensors4
diff -Nru cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/patches/619913.patch cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/patches/619913.patch
--- cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/patches/619913.patch	1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
+++ cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/patches/619913.patch	2013-03-23 21:51:28.000000000 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+From: Roland Hieber <rohieb@rohieb.name>
+Subject: Use power_now instead of current_now to read power from sysfs
+
+Apparently, current_now was renamed to power_now around kernel 2.6.36. The fix
+in this patch first tries to read from the new file name, if this does not
+exist, it tries the old name.
+
+Bug: 644567
+Author: niko2gare <http://sourceforge.net/users/niko2gare/>
+Origin: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3172707&group_id=58904&atid=489239
+Last-Update: 2012-10-12
+
+Modification to avoid checking closed battery
+From: Bernd Rinn (z-bb)
+Origin: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpufreqd/+bug/733507/+attachment/3022414/+files/cpufreqd-bug%23733507.patch
+Index: cpufreqd/src/cpufreqd_acpi_battery.c
+===================================================================
+--- cpufreqd.orig/src/cpufreqd_acpi_battery.c	2013-03-23 21:37:28.268379010 +0900
++++ cpufreqd/src/cpufreqd_acpi_battery.c	2013-03-23 21:38:23.392952250 +0900
+@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
+ #define PRESENT		"present"
+ #define STATUS		"status"
+ #define CURRENT_NOW	"current_now"
++#define POWER_NOW	"power_now"
+ 
+ struct battery_info {
+ 	int capacity;
+@@ -145,9 +146,13 @@
+ 	binfo->status = get_class_device_attribute(binfo->cdev, STATUS);
+ 	if (!binfo->status)
+ 		return -1;
+-	binfo->current_now = get_class_device_attribute(binfo->cdev, CURRENT_NOW);
+-	if (!binfo->current_now)
+-		return -1;
++	binfo->current_now = get_class_device_attribute(binfo->cdev, POWER_NOW);
++	if (!binfo->current_now) {
++		/* try the "current_now" name */
++		binfo->current_now = get_class_device_attribute(binfo->cdev, CURRENT_NOW);
++		if (!binfo->current_now)
++			return -1;
++	}
+ 
+ 	/* read the last full capacity, this is not going to change
+ 	 * very often, so no need to poke it later */
+@@ -311,6 +316,10 @@
+ 
+ 	/* Read battery informations */
+ 	for (i = 0; i < bat_dir_num; i++) {
++		if (!info[i].open) {
++			clog(LOG_INFO, "Skipping %s (closed)\n", info[i].cdev->name);
++			continue;
++		}
+ 
+ 		if (read_int(info[i].present, &info[i].is_present) != 0) {
+ 			clog(LOG_INFO, "Skipping %s\n", info[i].cdev->name);
diff -Nru cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/patches/series cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/patches/series
--- cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/patches/series	1970-01-01 09:00:00.000000000 +0900
+++ cpufreqd-2.4.2/debian/patches/series	2013-03-23 21:51:28.000000000 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+619913.patch

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 06:29 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Message-ID: <[🔎] 1364160589.24071.38.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
> > On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 11:29 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > > cpufreqd is in a relatively bad shape, unfortunately I haven't been able
> > > take care of it as I should have in quite some time.
> > > One bug seems particularly bad (severity is important at the moment):
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619913
> > > The patch is simple, the patch has been in use for some time, debdiff is
> > > attached. Can this fix go to wheezy?
> >
> > Please go ahead; thanks.

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: