[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#689822: marked as done (unblock wims/4.04~dfsg2-1)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:38:35 +0000
with message-id <20130324203814.GA19937@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#689822: Fwd: Bug#689822: release.debian.org: please accept the package wims_4.03a-8 into testing-proposed-updates
has caused the Debian Bug report #689822,
regarding unblock wims/4.04~dfsg2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689822: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689822
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney

I received one week ago an automated e-mail announcing that wims was
removed from testing. The automated information about the reason of this
operation was a "build-dependency on , node-uglify"

I checked that the package wims does not build-depend on node-uglify, and
also rebuilt it successfully in a wheezy chroot thanks to pbuilder.

Please would you accept the new package wims_4.03a-8 into
testing-proposed-updates? It provides a fix for the RC bug #687947
which was sent three weeks ago. PLease take a look at the attached debdiff
file.

I shall await your response before uploading the new package.

Thank you in advance.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (650, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

diff -Nru wims-4.03a/debian/changelog wims-4.03a/debian/changelog
--- wims-4.03a/debian/changelog	2012-06-24 16:12:50.000000000 +0200
+++ wims-4.03a/debian/changelog	2012-10-06 19:33:11.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+wims (4.03a-8) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  * removed files coming from upstream which are genrated by the
+    the script postinst. The fix is done by a few lines added to
+    the patch debian/patches/20root-makefile.patch
+    Closes: #687947
+
+ -- Georges Khaznadar <georgesk@ofset.org>  Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:09:34 +0200
+
 wims (4.03a-7) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * modified the description, thanks to Justin B Rye. Closes: #678745 
diff -Nru wims-4.03a/debian/patches/20root-makefile.patch wims-4.03a/debian/patches/20root-makefile.patch
--- wims-4.03a/debian/patches/20root-makefile.patch	2012-03-09 11:13:51.000000000 +0100
+++ wims-4.03a/debian/patches/20root-makefile.patch	2012-10-06 19:37:24.000000000 +0200
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 --- /dev/null
 +++ b/Makefile
-@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+@@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
 +DESTDIR =
 +WIMS_VERSION = 4.03a
 +
@@ -29,6 +29,13 @@
 +	  rm -rf wims/public_html/gifs/themes/$$d/.DS_Store; \
 +	  rm -rf wims/public_html/gifs/themes/$$d/.svn; \
 +	done
++	# remove files which are touched by postinst scripts
++	rm -f wims/log/unsecure
++	for f in supervisor.phtml visitor.phtml; do \
++	  for d in default standard; do \
++	    rm -f wims/public_html/themes/$$d/$$f; \
++	  done; \
++	done
 +
 +javabuild:
 +	# builds the java executables

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:45:42PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi Georges,
> 
> intrigeri wrote (28 Jan 2013 04:08:31 GMT) :
> > Hence, I suggest you propose a tentative debdiff of 4.03a-7+deb7u1 for
> > t-p-u that would fix the RC bugs only (#687947 at least), or closing
> > this bug and maintaining wims through wheezy-backports until Jessie is
> > out. I hope the former would be considered by the release team, on the
> > ground that erroneously wims was removed from testing due to a buggy
> > script on their side, but quite some time has passed since then so I'm
> > not sure what I would decide if I were in their position.
> 
> Ping? More than a month has passed, and I'm more and more tempted to
> recommend the release team to simply close this bug.

Closing. wims is not coming back in to testing at this stage, it's just too
late.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: