On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 08:57:02PM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 05:46:07AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > libsocialweb package in testing has a security bug as CVE-2012-4511,
> > and I've cherry-picked a patch from upstream as just 1 liner one.
> >
> > Please consider to unblock libsocialweb.
>
> The diff from testing to sid is not just your security fix:
>
> | Base version: libsocialweb_0.25.20-2 from testing
> | Target version: libsocialweb_0.25.20-3.1 from unstable
>
> If you want an isolated fix for the security issue it will have to go
> through t-p-u. I only glanced at the diff for sid, but it looks unsuitable
> at this stage (adding vala bindings, for example).
Ping?
--
Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature