Bug#685230: marked as done (unblock hylafax 3:6.0.6-4)

[owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)]

Your message dated Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:16:50 +0000
with message-id <32a6fd01f3dec66dcd22b8e0f9b5add7@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685230: unblock hylafax 3:6.0.6-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #685230,
regarding unblock hylafax 3:6.0.6-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685230: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685230
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

• To: submit@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: unblock hylafax 3:6.0.6-4
• From: Giuseppe Sacco <giuseppe@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org>
• Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:57:08 +0200
• Message-id: <1345298228.9345.6.camel@scarafaggio>

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,
during last month there were one seriuos and one grave bugs against
hylafax. Both of them have been fixed almost three weeks ago while
upting the package with some changes due to better use debconf.

The list of diff is not that long, and is restricted to the debian/
directory.

Could you please unblock hylafax?

I thank you very much,
Giuseppe

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• To: Giuseppe Sacco <giuseppe@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org>, <685230-done@bugs.debian.org>
• Cc: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, Joachim Wiedorn <ad_debian@joonet.de>, Ivo De Decker <ivo.dedecker@ugent.be>, Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
• Subject: Re: Bug#685230: unblock hylafax 3:6.0.6-4
• From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:16:50 +0000
• Message-id: <32a6fd01f3dec66dcd22b8e0f9b5add7@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
• In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1363503279.4793.7.camel@blatta>
• References: <1345298228.9345.6.camel@scarafaggio> <20120822224403.GK32139@mraw.org> <1350080835.25563.6.camel@scarafaggio> <20121201111842.GF5634@radis.cristau.org> <20121222213531.GA18040@ugent.be> <20130103183927.33e1f856@jupiter.home> <20130105231255.GC24283@ugent.be> <20130228211141.GS5761@radis.cristau.org> <[🔎] 20130301080027.2fd6b253@jupiter.home> <[🔎] 20130301103159.GA5761@radis.cristau.org> <[🔎] 1363503279.4793.7.camel@blatta>

On 17.03.2013 06:54, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:

Hi Julien,

Il giorno ven, 01/03/2013 alle 11.31 +0100, Julien Cristau ha scritto:

On Fri, Mar  1, 2013 at 08:00:27 +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:

[...]

> The next step is creating hylafax 6.0.6-5 as mentioned by Ivo De Decker.

> Should I already prepare these updated package of hylafax now?
>
If possible, yes.

The new hylafax version has been uploaded 5 days ago to unstable. The

diff against the testing version are the ones already agreed upon, i.e.,

a very small subset of what was already in unstable.

Could you please check if the package may be unblocked?

-5 was unblocked and migrated.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---