Re: New proposed-updates diff: spamassassin 3.3.1-1.1
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 19:07 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 13:08 -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:14:37PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On 12.03.2013 16:00, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
> > > >+spamassassin (3.3.1-1.1) stable; urgency=high
> > >
> > > "-1.1" seems a slightly odd version number for a maintainer upload.
> >
> > I went with the version number generated by dch's --security option,
> > since it doesn't have an option to generate an s-p-u version and
> > security seemed logically closest. Happy to re-upload with something
> > else if it matters.
[...]
> If the upload hadn't been made yet then I'd have suggested 3.3.1-1
> +squeeze1, but I'm not sure it's worth a reject / re-upload cycle just
> for that.
I've assumed from the lack of disagreement that you agree. :-) Flagged
for acceptance; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: