Your message dated Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:00:18 +0100 with message-id <20130313190018.GH5840@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#702132: unblock: linux/3.2.39-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #702132, regarding unblock: linux/3.2.39-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 702132: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702132 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: linux/3.2.39-2
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 00:45:39 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20130303004539.21548.55717.reportbug@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package linux This has numerous fixes for security vulnerabilities and data loss bugs. Also new hardware support, including stable drivers for current GPUs. The debdiff is *big*; diffstat is: 1010 files changed, 180997 insertions(+), 6504 deletions(-) and is therefore not attached. Most of the changes are under: debian/patches/features/all/alx/ debian/patches/features/all/drm/ debian/patches/features/all/fermi-accel/ [deleted] debian/patches/features/all/iguanair/ debian/patches/features/all/line6/ debian/patches/features/all/virtio_scsi/ for which the diffstat is: 153 files changed, 167984 insertions(+), 873 deletions(-) This is all new hardware support (with some risk of regressions in the drm drivers, but feedback so far is overwhelmingly positive). Excluding those and the generated files: debian/config.defines.dump debian/control debian/control.md5sum debian/rules.gen the diffstat is *somewhat* more reasonable: 853 files changed, 10707 insertions(+), 3735 deletions(-) Of that, 286 files, about 800 insertions and the same number of deletions are non-functional changes to the rt patch series, which is exported from a git branch that gets rebased. Ben. unblock linux/3.2.39-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>, 702132-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, linux@packages.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-cd@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#702132: unblock: linux/3.2.39-2
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:00:18 +0100
- Message-id: <20130313190018.GH5840@radis.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20130305213236.GN5514@mraw.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20130303004539.21548.55717.reportbug@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <[🔎] 20130303110408.GB5737@radis.cristau.org> <[🔎] 1362356641.3768.259.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <[🔎] 1362407471.3768.338.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <[🔎] 20130304143733.GF5840@radis.cristau.org> <[🔎] 1362453063.3768.375.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <[🔎] 20130305213236.GN5514@mraw.org>
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 22:32:36 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (05/03/2013): > > efivars from 3.2.39-2 will fail to load against the kernel from > > 3.2.35-2. That basically breaks installation on UEFI from amd64 > > netboot. > > That one is slightly annoying… I guess we could add that to the d-i > errata page and point people there when they start complaining? > > (Adding -boot/-cd to the loop accordingly; hello Steve!) > > > The ipv6 module (where it *is* a module, which is only some armel > > flavours) will also fail to load. > > I guess we could live with that other one. > > > I'm unclear on whether it's possible to let debs migrate without > > udebs, but if you could do that it would probably be best for now. > > [ adsb] not via britney, no > > Not delaying linux migration looks like a worthwhile goal, so… > breaking bits of netboot might be a necessary evil. > Steve said go ahead on IRC, so unblocked. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---