On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 21:06:01 +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote: > Great, we're not promising any security updates in *-backports, so > we can have: > * Moodle 1.9 in squeeze > * nothing in wheezy > * Moodle 2.2 with security issues in wheezy-backports, just to cover > for users that want to use it for the upgrade path > * LTS (possibly 2.6) in unstable, with migration to testing blocked > until the version is confirmed LTS. The preinst check seems like a > good idea. > Not promising security support doesn't mean knowingly shipping stuff that doesn't (and won't) get any fixes is reasonable. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature