[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#687583: marked as done (RM: altos/1.0.3)

Your message dated Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:05:58 +0000
with message-id <907826f8180c5d71c55d43c83e2a5a27@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687583: RM: altos/wheezy
has caused the Debian Bug report #687583,
regarding RM: altos/1.0.3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
687583: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687583
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package altos.  This version fixes RC bug #676739 which
was present at the time of wheezy freeze.  

Note that this is a new upstream release that is better in every way
than the version 1.0.3 currently in Debian, and not a minimal diff fixing
only the build-dep problem that is the cause of the RC bug.  It has
always been our intention that altos 1.1 be released with wheezy, it
just took much longer to complete our testing and release process than
expected, partly due to fire bans preventing test launches in Colorado
this summer.  Since this is a leaf package with nothing depending on it,
and the only real alternative is to request that altos be removed
entirely from the next stable release, we hope this will be considered
acceptable for an unblock.

Thanks!

Bdale

Attachment: pgpZzdBUQb07w.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 06.03.2013 08:15, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Please remove altos from testing as per maintainer comment in #676739. 

Hint added.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: