[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#700954: marked as done (RM: xgks/2.6.1-3)

Your message dated Sat, 2 Mar 2013 16:59:31 +0000
with message-id <20130302165931.GA5712@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#700954: RM: xgks/2.6.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #700954,
regarding RM: xgks/2.6.1-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
700954: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700954
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal

Please remove xgks (and consequently its reverse-dependency
ferret-vis).  It has multiple license problems that aren't being
addressed in a timely manner (bug #699066).

Thanks,
Mike

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:16:55AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Please remove xgks (and consequently its reverse-dependency
> ferret-vis).  It has multiple license problems that aren't being
> addressed in a timely manner (bug #699066).

Removal hint added, since there is still no resolution to the bug.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: