On 28.02.2013 09:26, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:As a side note, the changelog didn't really need: + * Note: these changes were part of this upload, even though + they were not detailed in this changelog entry when uploading:which will look a little odd to those perusing the changelog in future ratherthan diffing it, I suspect. Ah well.Hm, do you have a better wording for changelog entries that were supposed to accompany the changes of a past upload but had been forgotten?
I'd just have included them in the older changelog stanza "as is" and noted in the current version that I'd added them; there's no particular need to know in future versions that they were added after the fact. ymmv.
Regards, Adam