[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#699696: marked as done (pu: package libpam-shield/0.9.2-3.2)

Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:56:55 +0000
with message-id <1361620615.20752.10.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Closing p-u bugs included in point release
has caused the Debian Bug report #699696,
regarding pu: package libpam-shield/0.9.2-3.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
699696: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699696
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: jmw@debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Severity: normal

Release team--

I would like to request an update to the libpam-shield package in
squeeze. Attached is a debdiff fixing bug 658830. This bug prevents
the package from working at all in its default configuration. Since
this package is intended to provide a security function, Jonathan
Wiltshire has suggested an update in stable [0] and has offered to
sponsor the upload if the change is accepted. Candidate CVE is
CVE-2012-2350 [1].

The diff is a minimal change for this bug only. It is identical to
0.9.2-3.3 in testing, with the exception of targeting stable.

Thanks.

[0] http://prsc.debian.net/tracker/658830/
[1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-2350

Attachment: pam-shield_0.9.2-3.2-to-3.3+squeeze1.debdiff
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 6.0.7

Hi,

The package discussed in each of these bugs was added to stable as part
of today's point release.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: