Bug#700956: marked as done (RM: djmount/0.71-5)
Your message dated Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:49:01 +0100
with message-id <512544CD.1010209@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#700956: RM: djmount/0.71-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #700956,
regarding RM: djmount/0.71-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
700956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: RM: djmount/0.71-5
- From: Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:32:06 -0500
- Message-id: <CANTw=MOJ2YapdjOumU5xXL5DyNRyMbDbg9dPy+Wyj-cRSEh=JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
Please remove djmount (it has no reverse dependencies). It embeds
libupnp, which has an incredibly large number of security issues,
which aren't being fixed in a timely manner in this package (bug
#699561).
Thanks,
Mike
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2013-02-20 19:20, Dario Minnucci wrote:
>
> Hi Niels,
>
> On 02/20/2013 06:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2013-02-20 15:03, Dario Minnucci wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> djmount is always built using --with-external-libupnp and --with-external-talloc arguments to ensure
>>> is using libs provided by libtalloc-dev and libupnp-dev debian packages.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>
>
> Oops, I wasn't aware of #699561.
>
> I'll update and downgrade it in a minute.
>
> Sorry and thanks for the pointer.
>
> Regards,
>
Thanks for following up to #699561, I have taken the liberty of closing
it[1] along with this request so both will be removed from our TODO list.
~Niels
[1] Due to Yves-Alexis Perez's suggestion to do so and because it is
currently still of RC severity.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: