Re: ettercap security patches (stable and oldstable) for CVE-2013-0722
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 00:29 +0000, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> > That second change looks wrong to me. (For the avoidance of doubt, the
> > "=".)
>
> Yeah, it is a bogus =. Can't believe it was missed.
>
> In any case, these two #define's (NS_IN6ADDRSZ and NS_INT16SZ) are
> shadowed by others, so that code is dead and they can be removed.
I was somewhat assuming there might have been a further upload to fix
that. In any case, in order to make sure the fix gets in to the upcoming
point release, I've just flagged the package for acceptance.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: