[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#700409: marked as done (release.debian.org: wheezy-ignore tag for RC bug #700398 in ocl-icd)

Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:41:28 +0000
with message-id <0f89a37045b379f7c0039a6b82c7f140@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#700409: release.debian.org: wheezy-ignore tag for RC bug #700398 in ocl-icd
has caused the Debian Bug report #700409,
regarding release.debian.org: wheezy-ignore tag for RC bug #700398 in ocl-icd
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
700409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

  Hi,

  #700398 is a FTBFS (one failing test) of my ocl-icd package in
unstable.
Due to the freeze, ocl-icd is the same in unstable and testing (1.3-3)
So, technically speaking, ocl-icd 1.3-3 in wheezy has a grave bug
and should be fixed or removed.

  However:
- the FTBFS is due to opencl-headers in unstable (1.2-2012.11.30-2)
  that have more functions than in wheezy (1.2-2012.04.18a-1)
- ocl-icd correctly fixes its failing test in 2.0.2 (just uploaded to
  experimental) but this new upstream version has too many changes
  (lots of code refactorization since 1.3) to be accpeted in wheezy
- ocl-icd does not FTBFS in a plain wheezy environment

  The last point make me think that it would be better to tag this bug
wheezy-ignore. Do you agree?
  The other possibilities I see are to downgrade the severity or fix the
ocl-icd package in unstable by desactivating the failing test.

  Regards,
    Vincent

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386 armel mipsel

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 12.02.2013 13:21, Vincent Danjean wrote:

  #700398 is a FTBFS (one failing test) of my ocl-icd package in
unstable.

[...]

- the FTBFS is due to opencl-headers in unstable (1.2-2012.11.30-2)
  that have more functions than in wheezy (1.2-2012.04.18a-1)
- ocl-icd correctly fixes its failing test in 2.0.2 (just uploaded to
  experimental) but this new upstream version has too many changes
  (lots of code refactorization since 1.3) to be accpeted in wheezy
- ocl-icd does not FTBFS in a plain wheezy environment
The last point make me think that it would be better to tag this bug 
wheezy-ignore. Do you agree?


No. :-) (See below.)
The other possibilities I see are to downgrade the severity or fix the 
ocl-icd package in unstable by desactivating the failing test.
The possibility you missed is making use of the BTS's distribution tags. With the bug tagged "sid", it no longer appears on the list of RC bugs affecting testing, as exported by the BTS for britney's purposes and displayed at <URL:http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/testing.html> 

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: