On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:12:10PM +0100, Philippe Le Brouster wrote: > The version 0.3.10 of fs2ram doesn't fit for wheezy. Please see the > Bug#700312 fixed in the version 0.3.12. > > There are two possibilities that sounds good for me: > > - Pull fs2ram 0.3.12 to testing[1] > or > - Remove fs2ram 0.3.10 from testing (and fs2ram will be backported for wheezy after released) > > [1] Bug#691742, especially http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691742#20 At a glance the diff from wheezy -> sid makes me uncomfortable; certainly some of the changelog entries would normally rule it out for an unblock. I will add a removal hint if you are sure that's the path you want to take, or you can propose isolated fixes through tpu if you like. -- Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 <directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature