[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#695265: fs2ram



On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 04:12:10PM +0100, Philippe Le Brouster wrote:
> The version 0.3.10 of fs2ram doesn't fit for wheezy. Please see the
> Bug#700312 fixed in the version 0.3.12.
> 
> There are two possibilities that sounds good for me:
>     
>     - Pull fs2ram 0.3.12 to testing[1]
>  or 
>     - Remove fs2ram 0.3.10 from testing (and fs2ram will be backported for wheezy after released)
> 
> [1] Bug#691742, especially http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691742#20

At a glance the diff from wheezy -> sid makes me uncomfortable; certainly
some of the changelog entries would normally rule it out for an unblock. I
will add a removal hint if you are sure that's the path you want to take,
or you can propose isolated fixes through tpu if you like.


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: