[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#689814: marked as done (unblock: gnuradio/3.6.1-1)



Your message dated Mon, 11 Feb 2013 23:24:24 +0000
with message-id <20130211232424.GA23725@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#689814: unblock: gnuradio/3.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689814,
regarding unblock: gnuradio/3.6.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689814: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689814
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

The gnuradio 3.6.1-1 source was accepted into unstable
on 12 June 2012:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnuradio/news/20120612T181727Z.html

Since that was before the Wheezy freeze, this should apply:
"Any packages in unstable before the 19:52 dinstall begins on that day
will be given automatic freeze exceptions (for the specific version in
unstable)."

All other architectures built before the freeze, the ia64 binaries
only recently have been uploaded.
(Subject: gnuradio_3.6.1-1_ia64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
 Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 04:17:55 +0000)

It would be good to release Wheezy with gnuradio 3.6.1

- -Maitland
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAlBwVCAACgkQkwbJvNrxBUzhAgCfXQ37ln8i8GnpadAcQJeAeJ2T
kGsAn2VVM2qXLucIg3anZw1jCCYLzSnA
=S4F+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:20:45PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Mehdi Dogguy wrote (07 Oct 2012 15:50:08 GMT) :
> > Sorry if this wasn't clear but I meant targeted patches. In order to
> > evaluate the request, we'd like to see concrete minimal patches to fix
> > issues (and an explanation about its importance).
> 
> > At this point of the freeze, we are not going to accept 3.6.1, sorry.
> 
> Since then, I've seen no indication that A. Maitland Bottoms intends
> to prepare an upload for t-p-u, so I suggest the release team now
> closes this unblock request, and the maintainers weigh if they
> consider 3.5.3.2-1 good enough for a Debian stable release.

Agreed; it's easy enough to reopen if the need arises.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: