Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2013 06:12:59 +0000 with message-id <1360217579.4494.24.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#699944: RM: slapos.core/0.25-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #699944, regarding RM: slapos.core/0.25-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 699944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699944 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: RM: slapos.core/0.25-2
- From: Arnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:42:52 +0900
- Message-id: <87a9rgd99v.fsf@duckcorp.org>
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal Hello, slapos.core currently available in testing is too outdated and the changes introduced in later releases are too significant, thus upstream would prefer not having the package released with wheezy. So, could you please remove the package from testing? Thanks! Regards, -- Arnaud FontaineAttachment: pgpkrjc_g6v6g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Arnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org>, 699944-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#699944: RM: slapos.core/0.25-2
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 06:12:59 +0000
- Message-id: <1360217579.4494.24.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- In-reply-to: <87a9rgd99v.fsf@duckcorp.org>
- References: <87a9rgd99v.fsf@duckcorp.org>
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 13:42 +0900, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > slapos.core currently available in testing is too outdated and the > changes introduced in later releases are too significant, thus upstream > would prefer not having the package released with wheezy. So, could you > please remove the package from testing? Thanks! Removal hint added. Regards, Adam
--- End Message ---