Bug#699465: t-p-u: gdcm 2.2.0-14
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Adam D. Barratt
<adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 09:39 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Adam D. Barratt
>> <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
>> > On 31.01.2013 17:36, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> >>
>> >> As per §5.13.3. Direct updates to testing, I'd like to ask
>> >> permission for direct upload to testing for package gdcm.
> [...]
>> > Please attach a debdiff of the proposed upload to this bug log, as suggested
>> > in Neil's earlier mail.
>>
>> Attached. And deb was dupload'ed.
>
> Unfortunately it FTBFS on armhf. The control file still lists the -cil
> packages as built on that architecture, which then fails because the
> build-dependencies aren't available.
>
> It looks like control.in has a substitution variable which updates both
> the build-dependency lists and the architecture lists for the binary
> packages. Was debian/control directly edited in this case instead?
> (Maybe because the mono packages in wheezy still list armhf as
> supported, which this upload is intended to be a move towards fixing.)
Correct -again-, I know I should not have done that.
Anyway I'll wait until mono properly enter testing and then -as Niels
explained- will fix both testing+unstable
Sorry for the mess,
Reply to: