Re: Update on state of Mono for Wheezy
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 17:21 +0000, Jo Shields wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 21:45 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Assuming that supporting mono/armhf in a stable release is still not
> > practical, is there anything we can do to help move this forward?
[...]
> I've uploaded a -7 package, which addresses CVE-2012-3543 and #695743
> (the outstanding armhf issue affecting various non-mono-team leaf
> packages). It's built fine on all arches, although since it's a day with
> a Y in it the ia64 build hasn't been uploaded yet.
Thanks; I've unblocked that as an aid to showing us what's still broken.
virtuoso-opensource has been uploaded and unblocked and #699542 filed
for the tidy-up. I've just filed #699568-72 for the binary removals for
mod-mono, activiz.net, mono-fuse, fsgateway and mummy.
That'll just leave us with gdcm.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: