[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#694761: marked as done (unblock python-scipy: missing sources in tarball)

Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:32:44 +0000
with message-id <20130127113244.GP5971@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#694761: unblock pre-approval: python-scipy missing sources, how to proceed
has caused the Debian Bug report #694761,
regarding unblock python-scipy: missing sources in tarball
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
694761: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694761
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

hello,

I'm asking for advice on how to proceed with bug 589731.
The missing sources problem there is solved in svn [1, r23110, debdiff
attached], but the question is whether we want to regenerate the C files
created from these sources for Wheezy.
Wheezy is built using pregenerated C files created with cython 0.15
whereas wheezy has cython 0.15.1, so we inevitable get different output.
0.15.1 is a bugfix only release so hopefully it should only get better.
Unfortunately the diff when regenerating the sources is very large and
pretty much unreviewable (attached see [2] for comments)

To somewhat check if everything is ok I ran a couple of quite
thorough testsuites of rdepends (pandas, statsmodels, nipy and of
course scipys own testsuite) with no issues.

please advise if I should request sponsorship for the version with only
the pyx sources added to the tarball and no regeneration (svn revision
23110), or the version that also regenerates the c files from the pyx
sources (svn revision 23112).



[1] svn://svn.debian.org/python-modules/packages/scipy/trunk
[2]
 cluster/_vq_rewrite.c     | 5251
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 interpolate/interpnd.c    | 1036 ++++-----
 interpolate/interpnd.pyx  | 1166 ++++++++++
 io/matlab/mio5_utils.c    |  149 -
 io/matlab/mio_utils.c     |    4
 io/matlab/streams.c       |  370 +--
 signal/spectral.c         |   73
 spatial/ckdtree.c         |  159 -
 spatial/qhull.c           |  461 ++--
 special/lambertw.c        |   79
 special/orthogonal_eval.c | 1253 +++++-----
 stats/vonmises_cython.c   |  128 -
 12 files changed, 8308 insertions(+), 1821 deletions(-)

according to my buildlog _vq_rewrite.c is not used (it uses the non
rewrite-version)
interpnd.pyx is generated from interpnd.pyx.in which again generates
interpnd.c

Attachment: 0001-change-by-recythoning.patch.xz
Description: application/xz

Attachment: scipy.debdiff.xz
Description: application/xz

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 19:13:40 +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:

> retitle 694761 unblock python-scipy: missing sources in tarball
> thanks
> 
> after discussion wit jcristau in irc I prepared an upload regenerating all
> sources which was sponsored by Yaroslav Halchenko.
> Please unblock it for wheezy, as it does not fix a (known) runtime issue you
> can take your time.
> 
Unblocked, thanks for your work.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: