[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#698984: unblock: simpleid - fixes RC issue with OpenID 2.0 support



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



On 26/01/13 02:10, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:36:14AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> This is a one-liner fix backported from upstream 0.8.3 to create
>> a 0.8.1-11 package (replacing 0.8.1-10)
>> 
>> It also updates debian/control to refer to the new pkg-auth team 
>> maintainership and VCS locations
>> 
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698037
>> 
>> I attach the debdiff contents
> 
> I don't object to the actual fix for this bug number, but...
> 
>> There is another important issue that requires a backported fix,
>> maybe not an RC issue, it is fixed upstream, I would prefer to
>> take the latest upstream version, 0.8.3, which has been cut from
>> a stable release branch: 
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698396
>> 
>> I would appreciate feedback from the release team about
>> willingness to accept 0.8.3.  Given that OpenID is a
>> distributed/networked protocol, I believe it is important to use
>> and support the most recent version.
> 
> That's impossible to say without a diff.

I understand the release team generally is not keen on new upstream
releases - but if I submit a diff for 0.8.1 - 0.8.3, can you please
tell me if it will be looked at in this instance, given the nature of
the package and the need to maintain interoperability with the wider
world of OpenID consumers?

>> Section: web Priority: extra -Maintainer: Daniel Pocock
>> <daniel@pocock.com.au> -Uploaders: Stuart Teasdale
>> <sdt@debian.org> +Maintainer: Debian Authentication Maintainers
>> <pkg-auth-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> Build-Depends:
>> debhelper (>= 8), cdbs (>= 0.4.89) Standards-Version: 3.9.3
> 
> No chance. 
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Maintainer

Can
> 
you please clarify?  Many packages are now maintained by groups.
In this case, I am personally the admin for the group and will
continue to receive correspondence about the package.




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=zI5L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: