On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:07:04 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > --- expect-5.45/debian/control
> > +++ expect-5.45/debian/control
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > Package: expect
> > Architecture: any
> > Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
> > +Breaks: expectk (<< 5.45)
>
> AFAIK you should use "Conflicts" if you want to get a package removed.
> A versioned "Breaks" is better suited when you want to force the upgrade
> of the broken package but in this case, there's no updated package, so
> you should avoid it and favor "Conflicts".
>
Anything like that needs to get tons of testing to ensure it doesn't
have unwanted results in squeeze to wheezy upgrades.
Cheers,
Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature