On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:05:02PM +0000, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm wrong, but from what I can see only the first and last hunks
> > patching setup.py are actually relevant, the rest just renames the
> > argument? Did I miss something significant?
>
>
> Yes in fact I took the patch from the upstream and adapt the rules file to use the
> renamed option.
>
> If you think that it it better to take only the first and the last chunk, just tell me.
I would prefer that, yes. Otherwise no objections, please ping the bug when
it's uploaded.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature