[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#689578: sysklogd modifies /etc/syslog.conf with helper script



On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 07:59:58 +0100
Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> wrote:

> Am 21.01.2013 02:32, schrieb Andres Salomon:
> >>> A better approach imho would be to simply remove sysklogd from the
> >>> archive. It's dead upstream, apparently no longer properly
> >>> maintained in Debian, and there are enough more then suitable
> >>> alternatives. With rsyslog we even have a drop-in replacement.
> >>>
> >> I've added a hint to remove it from wheezy.
> > 
> > Hm.  Rather than simply remove it, can we actually provide an
> > upgrade path to rsyslog?  I'd be happy to NMU a version of ksyslogd
> > that does this in unstable (for consideration in wheezy), as long
> > as rsyslog is truly a drop-in replacement.
> 
> It was an explicit decision back then, to not remove sysklogd
> automatically on upgrades.
> If sysklogd/klogd are converted to transitional packages, which simply
> pull in rsyslog, then any configuration changes should be migrated
> over to then new config file, imo.
> sysklogd uses /etc/syslog.conf and rsyslog /etc/rsyslog.conf

*Nod*.

> 
> > It seems that new squeeze installs default to using rsyslog.
> > However, I still have several older systems that've been upgraded
> > from earlier Debian releases that are still using ksyslogd/klogd.
> > There's been no indication that ksyslogd had been deprecated in
> > favor of something else.
> 
> Something like
> http://www.debian.org/releases/lenny/i386/release-notes/ch-whats-new#system-changes

"We're switching to a new default syslogd" != "remove sysklogd (the
old default syslogd), as it is deprecated and unmaintained".  Debian's
default MTA is exim; that doesn't mean postfix and sendmail are
unmaintained.


> 
> That said, a removal of the package is a clear indication that the
> package is no longer maintained and should be replaced, isn't it?

Yes, as long as one notices that the package is removed.  Like I said,
I wouldn't have noticed if not for a bug in the package.  The package
is still in sid.  If it's slated to be dropped from the archive, I
think it's worth either automating an upgrade to the replacement, or
informing users.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: