[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#687731: marked as done (Stable update for xen)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:17:32 +0100
with message-id <20130119141732.GK5676@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#687731: Stable update for xen
has caused the Debian Bug report #687731,
regarding Stable update for xen
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
687731: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687731
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu squeeze
Control: submitter -1 Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>

On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 13:24 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 21:09:48 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:55:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 20:51 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > I'd like to fix an boot error of Xen on several newer machines in
> > > > stable.
> > > I'm assuming this is fixed in at least unstable already, given the dates
> > > of the commits referenced in the bug report?
> > 
> > It is included in 4.1.0.
> > 
> > > Please could we have a full source debdiff for the proposed package,
> > > against the package currently in stable?
> > 
> > Sure.
> > 
> This should probably be rebased on top of -5.2.

Filing as a bug to improve the chances of it not getting missed (again).

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 14:35:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Filing as a bug to improve the chances of it not getting missed (again).
> 
14:09 < jcristau> should #687731 be closed?
14:18 < adsb> if no-one cares about it getting fixed, maybe. istr the diff not 
              really being reviewable
14:28 < jcristau> aiui waldi doesn't...
15:15 < waldi> jcristau: no, i don't. i stopped careing after the security 
               debacle

Closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: