[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#698341: pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1



On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 09:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> retitle 698341 pu: package spatialite/3.0.0~beta20110817-3+deb7u1
> user 698341 release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> usertags 698341 = pu

Nope. "pu" is for stable; fixed up.

> I've applied the debdiff prepared by Felix Geyer in #683075 [0], and checked
> that it compiles fine in wheezy.
> 
> In any case, I'm attaching the final diff (modulo
> s/UNRELEASED/testing-proposed-updates/) to this email.

+-              int ret =
+-                  freexl_get_cell_value (handle, 0, col, &type, &int_value,
+-                                         &dbl_value, &text_value);
++              FreeXL_CellValue cell;
++              int ret = freexl_get_cell_value (handle, 0, col, &cell);

Hmmmm, so there was an API change in freexl_get_cell_value. As the
SONAME hasn't changed, are the two versions of the library
ABI-compatible - i.e. a package built against either version will run
correctly against the other?

> The other bug afflicting spatialite is #664547. To fix this, we need to split
> some huge file (I guess it's spatialite.c, 17k+ LOC) into smaller files, so
> that gcc doesn't die on some arches. Would you be ok with such a huge patch?

The bug log suggests "we need to split up quite a lot of source
modules"; more information there would be useful. In any case, this is
the kind of bug which we'd generally prefer to be fixed in unstable
first. (I'm not entirely sure why nothing has happened in that bug log
since July.)

Regards,

Adam


Reply to: