[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#695265: marked as done (RM: fs2ram/3.0.10 testing)



Your message dated Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:49:14 +0100
with message-id <50D3337A.4030505@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#695265: RM: fs2ram/3.0.10 testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #695265,
regarding RM: fs2ram/3.0.10 testing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
695265: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695265
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Hi, as explained in the bug 691742[1], The current version of fs2ram in
testing is RC buggy. The last upload fixing this the RC bug was late
according to the debian release objective for wheezy. So, I prefer
fs2ram be removed from testing.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691742

fs2ram is a leaf package. There is no dependency problem to remove
it.

Thanks for the release team efforts !

Cheers,
-- 
Philippe Le Brouster
 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2012-12-10 10:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> 
> [...]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> There is currently no open RC bug against fs2ram.  #691742 lists #679715
> as the RC bug against fs2ram; but #679715 does affect fs2ram/0.3.10
> according to the BTS.  So fs2ram is (currently) not RC buggy in testing
> nor sid.  So in the current state, there is no visible reason for us to
> remove fs2ram from testing.
> 
> If #679715 also affects the testing version, please mark it as such[1].
>  Otherwise, if you believe fs2ram/0.3.10 is unfit for Wheeze, please
> file an RC bug against fs2ram (ensure "found in version" is/includes
> 0.3.10).
>   If either unfit or #679715 also affects the testing version, let us
> know and we will remove the package.  Otherwise simply close this bug.
> 
> ~Niels
> 
> [1] unarchive it and add a found version on fs2ram/0.3.10.  If this
> causes the bug to be re-opened, please re-close it and ensure the BTS
> knows that fs2ram/0.3.12 has fixed the bug.
> 
> 

Closing as there is no new information and no RC bug.  Please re-open
(or file a new bug) if the situation changes.

~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply to: