Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:10:52 +0200 with message-id <20120915191052.GX5308@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#686463: followup has caused the Debian Bug report #686463, regarding RM: lomoco/1.0beta1+1.0-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 686463: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686463 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: RM: lomoco/1.0beta1+1.0-5
- From: Thibaut VARENE <varenet@gropaf.esiee.fr>
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 22:52:43 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120901205243.21448.69606.reportbug@gropaf.esiee.fr>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Dead upstream, orphaned. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/32 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Thibaut VARENE <varenet@debian.org>, 686463-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#686463: followup
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:10:52 +0200
- Message-id: <20120915191052.GX5308@radis.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] CA+DQjFiwRERxNVhmNOS9VjpXtj7xdNNk83dnmh-cwR4M44TWwg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[🔎] CA+DQjFiwRERxNVhmNOS9VjpXtj7xdNNk83dnmh-cwR4M44TWwg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 23:44:38 +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> > > > In that case, would it not make more sense to remove it from unstable? > > Sure, why not. Removing it from the upcoming stable distribution is > really necessary anyway. > Marked for removal from testing. Removal from sid should be requested separately. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---