[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#686641: unblock: bsnes/0.088-4



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package bsnes

Update closes RC bug #684840 (FTBFS).
It's a workaround for a gcc bug, but I'm under the impression that gcc will not be updated soon.


unblock bsnes/0.088-4

Here is the debdiff:

diff -Nru bsnes-0.088/debian/changelog bsnes-0.088/debian/changelog
--- bsnes-0.088/debian/changelog	2012-05-11 13:31:08.000000000 +0200
+++ bsnes-0.088/debian/changelog	2012-09-04 01:57:13.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+bsnes (0.088-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Add workaround for g++ bug PR c++/53821. (Closes: #684840)
+
+ -- Tobias Hansen <tobias.han@gmx.de>  Tue, 04 Sep 2012 01:54:01 +0200
+
 bsnes (0.088-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Add bsnes-purify to the bsnes package.
diff -Nru bsnes-0.088/debian/patches/gcc-pr53821-workaround.patch bsnes-0.088/debian/patches/gcc-pr53821-workaround.patch
--- bsnes-0.088/debian/patches/gcc-pr53821-workaround.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ bsnes-0.088/debian/patches/gcc-pr53821-workaround.patch	2012-08-28 01:45:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Description: Work around gcc bug PR c++/53821
+ This bug is present in Wheezys gcc-4.7 4.7.1-2.
+ It is fixed in gcc-4.7 4.7.1-3.
+Author: Tobias Hansen <tobias.han@gmx.de>
+
+--- a/bsnes/nall/sort.hpp
++++ b/bsnes/nall/sort.hpp
+@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
+   }
+ 
+   template<typename T>
++  inline
+   void sort(T list[], unsigned size) {
+     return sort(list, size, [](const T &l, const T &r) { return l < r; });
+   }
diff -Nru bsnes-0.088/debian/patches/series bsnes-0.088/debian/patches/series
--- bsnes-0.088/debian/patches/series	2012-05-10 14:25:37.000000000 +0200
+++ bsnes-0.088/debian/patches/series	2012-08-27 22:45:42.000000000 +0200
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
 detect-endianness.patch
 remove-march=native-build-flag.patch
 fix-purify-header-removal-and-input.patch
+gcc-pr53821-workaround.patch


Reply to: