On dim., 2012-09-02 at 15:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > A version with just the patch would be cleaner, but it looks like the > package is already using dh9 so the build-dep change is arguably a > no-op; please go ahead and let us know once the package has been > accepted. Done, with only the patch. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part