[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#686199: unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-11



On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 06:07:55PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 03:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 03:01 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> Please unblock package xen-api.

> >> The PAM fix which we did for version 1.3.2-10 wasn't correct, and thanks to
> >> the help of Steve Langasek, we have it in a good shape now.

> >> The details of the conversation is available in the Ubuntu BTS here:
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen-api/+bug/1033899

> > Trying to view that conversation gives me:

> > Launchpad.net
> > Lost something?
> > This page does not exist, or you may not have permission to see it.

> > That's not particularly helpful... :/

> Indeed, this is a permission problem in this page, its marked as
> "Private Security". I'm not sure how the Ubuntu stuff works though.

> I'm not a PAM specialist, and I'm afraid I can't comment much in here.
> Mike is unfortunately away for a while (I'm not sure I should disclose
> why), so he wont be able to explain what was wrong in version -10. I
> have to admit that I was busy doing other stuff, and that I'm not sure
> what the problem was.

> Steve, can you comment about the changes in the PAM settings committed
> in this latest version of XCP, and explain to the release team why we
> needed to change it and unblock the fixed xen-api/1.3.2-11? Thanks in
> advance.

I've talked to the Ubuntu security team and they've unembargoed the bug;
there's no reason to keep it private when there's public conversation
pointing at the fact that it's a security issue.  So that link works now.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: