On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 18:25:28 -0500, Rob Browning wrote: > I suppose we could do what gcc-defaults does, i.e. 4:4.7.1-1, or in this > case 23:*. That might be reasonable. > Really shouldn't use the emacs version as epoch. That's also not what gcc does. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature