[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#672117: marked as done (transition: libextractor)

Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 00:11:03 +0200
with message-id <20120529221103.GH32293@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#672117: transition: libextractor
has caused the Debian Bug report #672117,
regarding transition: libextractor
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
672117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release Team,

I am filing this bug for the transition of the "libextractor" package.
Upstream released a new version, bumping the ABI version (SONAME) from 1c2a to 3.
Among the reverse deps, it may not be necessary to binNMU gnunet, since a new version is waiting for a sponsor on mentors.
The new package is already waiting for a sponsor on mentors, see RFS #669717. 

Best regards,
Bertrand

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> (27/05/2012):
> On Sonntag, 27. Mai 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > This also means that vdr (and dozens of related packages) can't
> > migrate,
> 
> eek.

Massaged it this way:
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/05/msg00829.html

> > Alternative way of getting stuff unfucked at this point: reupload
> > the old package (with an epoch, or with a $foo.really-is.$bar
> > trick), until you're able to fix all those RC bugs?
> 
> as said yesterday on irc I will look into this today and tomorrow...

Thanks for your efforts. It migrated during tonight's run, and old
binaries are gone from testing. Closing this bug report accordingly.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: