[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Candidates for removal from testing



I can get #651620 (rocksndiamonds)
I fixed this some time ago for Slackware.

2012/5/13 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

We are considering removing the following packages from testing as they
have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be found in
the attached dd-list.  The bugs that put them on this list can be found
in the removals.txt file (also attached) just above the package name.

The packages have been selected based on the following criteria:
- - The package had at least one RC bug without activity for the past
 14 days.
- - If a bug is assigned to multiple packages, both packages will be
 affected.
- - The RC bug affects both unstable and testing.
- - The affected package does not have any reverse dependencies in
 testing.

These tools[1] are rather new and therefore we have randomly chosen
about 30 packages from the originally generated list. These packages
were manually verified to fit the criteria listed above.

If the relevant RC bugs in the affected packages are not dealt with
before the 27th of May., the packages will be removed from testing. Note
that "dealt with" may also include downgrading a severity-inflated bug
or fixing affected versions in the BTS.

Note, this email has been BCC'ed to the respective
*@packages.qa.debian.org emails.

Thanks,
Niels (on behalf of the Release Team)

[1] The tools are available from:

svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/rc-buggy-leaf-packages




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=MR2I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: