[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#670730: marked as done (pu: package giplet/0.2.3-3+squeeze1)

Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2012 13:32:55 +0100
with message-id <dda96cc3369bdcdc1a3cdf68c2fc2f56@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Closing requests for packages included in 6.0.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #670730,
regarding pu: package giplet/0.2.3-3+squeeze1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
670730: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670730
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi

First of all, giplet is already removed from the archive for wheezy,
as it needs porting to new libpanel-applet interface but upstream is
not active anymore.

 [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/638119

giplet has in its preferences to check for ip on interfaces eth0 wlan0
and www.whatismyip.org. But the last one does not work anymore [2].

 [2]: http://bugs.debian.org/670692

Would the following debdiff be acceptable to upload to stable-updates,
and to stable-proposed-updates for the next point release?

The change is minimal, and a user can decide itself which preferences
to set, www.whatismyip.org is simply a not anymore working variant.
The default preferences thus changed to 'eth0 wlan0
checkip.dyndns.org'.

Please let me know, if I should update the package. If you agree on
an upload, could you consider makeing it already available for
stable-updates?

I'm not using giplet anymore and Fabrizio Regalli was for short time
the new maintainer before we agreed on to ask for removal of giplet
from the archive due to a) upstream not active and b) it needs first
porting.

Regards,
Salvatore

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPnAZUAAoJEHidbwV/2GP+SrEQAKTYDy99wwmlPTz/sgMhfoRu
EF2fywDJqckRFNFlsw5epiPkcRxxmsfstmBt5JYQ1jEfy3V2/CG9yLo170cf5zua
RfYbqhdhYgJXEYkaNdf50idWY2JfeV8FVyMp5XxzwVpneKuCKEH5w/GbIqi4qxoz
Vd6gADqCRO7WxcyoaXTg5xtJZKXdcgi9IPj6Zzr4UbKwhjeihmV5lMXfcLRvI8mJ
d4pDuJCiY4Jpk/LwpdonM7hA7AwJ/cTFV5rchScXRXgXbeI/N0WBYCi8WiYfHLcH
ZsAyF/7oWXjPywJIW1YVEus6QLDkgIkNr9s4alEVK+kLZTKVTNDIo+jYn16Y5acf
3TlFhQC6Av4Bju3mi6KxofcSs7t14D3x3cr/zPaPwCz9iCGoPKx6DbjazDuqk9RC
ZtSviiwjQDgPkS/ICovPf/o+/6douYAEFkbQOG56YN/vJhD43sY92cc5bEBuZOAF
pWEjXjwP6i7KAe0Pac6InIxZOoRhcsPkKcsDk0mvXpejNTOjak1l8CIzqVbPT9z0
F8qnE2L+PjVwmJvjYA2oppD0cx11aXKIglrWBSUYoWHJbo/rgTOuMXh5ad95qNTO
JP+OTdGm4OMIP7bc3C+MujiGERDXlqoXyWDGWNG2vRBtYd7LoW/hwrslmXgMChhQ
5DTJaaZxy+/tE4rAvqfn
=2XP7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

diff -Nru giplet-0.2.3/debian/changelog giplet-0.2.3/debian/changelog
--- giplet-0.2.3/debian/changelog	2010-01-22 20:44:55.000000000 +0100
+++ giplet-0.2.3/debian/changelog	2012-04-28 16:41:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+giplet (0.2.3-3+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+  * Add change-checkip-remoteurl-preference.patch patch.
+    Change preferences on where to check the IP. www.whatismyip.org does not
+    work anymore, change the setting to use checkip.dyndns.org.
+    Thanks to Axel Stammler <axst@users.sourceforge.net> for the report.
+    (Closes: #670692)
+
+ -- Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>  Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:40:52 +0200
+
 giplet (0.2.3-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Convert to '3.0 (quilt)' package source format. 
diff -Nru giplet-0.2.3/debian/patches/change-checkip-remoteurl-preference.patch giplet-0.2.3/debian/patches/change-checkip-remoteurl-preference.patch
--- giplet-0.2.3/debian/patches/change-checkip-remoteurl-preference.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ giplet-0.2.3/debian/patches/change-checkip-remoteurl-preference.patch	2012-04-28 16:41:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+Description: Change preference for checking IP remotely
+ www.whatismyip.org changed how the IP is given back as an image and
+ thus giplet can't handle this anymore. Change the interface preference
+ to check against checkip.dyndns.org.
+ .
+ Add workaround for intltool bug [1].
+ .
+  [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/560704
+Origin: vendor
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/670692
+Forwarded: no
+Author: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
+Last-Update: 2012-04-28
+
+--- a/src/gipletprefs.py
++++ b/src/gipletprefs.py
+@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
+ class GipPrefs:
+     """Giplet Preferences Class"""
+     def __init__(self, _conf_path):
+-        self.interface = 'eth0 wlan0 www.whatismyip.org'
++        self.interface = 'eth0 wlan0 checkip.dyndns.org'
+         self.interval = 10
+         self.conf_client = gconf.client_get_default()
+         self.conf_path = _conf_path
+--- a/po/POTFILES.skip
++++ b/po/POTFILES.skip
+@@ -1 +1,2 @@
+ servers/GNOME_GipletApplet.server.in
++.pc/change-checkip-remoteurl-preference.patch/src/gipletprefs.py
diff -Nru giplet-0.2.3/debian/patches/series giplet-0.2.3/debian/patches/series
--- giplet-0.2.3/debian/patches/series	2010-01-22 16:37:43.000000000 +0100
+++ giplet-0.2.3/debian/patches/series	2012-04-28 16:41:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 565175-updated-ru-translation.patch
 565487-updated-pt-translation.patch
+change-checkip-remoteurl-preference.patch

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 6.0.5

Hi,
All of the packages referenced by the closed bugs were included in the 6.0.5 point release which occured today. 

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: