On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 18:55:49 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > strigi was fixed, the gnome-commander and hugin builds were both tried on > brahms (and did succeed on other architectures). > Other architectures didn't switch to 4.7. > > What's worse is that at least for the last two, there were no gcc 4.7 bug > > reports for them! And don't tell me thins changed for them, since hugin is > > getting his *fourth* binNMU in a row. > > no, because it's a buildd issue, or an gmp issue, afaics. Again, please don't > blame the compiler if you can't explain a build failure. > No it ain't. > so what is the status of brahms? > It's happy since it reverted to gmp 5.0.4. Less so since it upgraded gcc to 4.7. > > You're making our job difficult. It's really ***NOT*** appreciated. > > well, not deciding on the release architectures for over a year now makes my > job difficult as well. still trying to get it done. > If you have specific concerns with a specific arch feel free to raise them on -release and the corresponding port's mailing list, and we'll take that into account. Not in this thread. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature