[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Your "wims" stable upload



Ping?

On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 19:47 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 15:59 +0000, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> > Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > > I noticed that you've uploaded "wims" to stable, in order to resolve
> > > #574235.  Was this discussed with any member of the Release Team
> > > beforehand?  If so, please could you point me at that discussion,
> > > because I'm currently unable to find it.
> > 
> > I sent a single e-mail to the Release Team just before uploading the
> > pqckage, so it can be not considered as a discussion.
> 
> Hmmm, when was that?  I still can't find it in my local mail, and it
> doesn't appear to be in the archives on lists.debian.org.
> 
> (In fact, neither of your mails today appear to have made it to the list
> or the archive either...)
> 
> > So here are elements to explain the upload I did:
> > 
> > - the bug #574235 is fixed in unstable: wims 4.03 is pretty installable.
> 
> Okay.  Which is the earliest version in which the affected code was
> either fixed or removed?  Please mark the bug as fixed in that version
> so that it's clearer what's going on.
> 
> >   However the first installation attempt always
> >   aborts when there is no earlier version of the package installed. The
> >   patch sent by Andreas is simple and fixes this bug nicely. The modification
> >   is just based on a reordering of commands in the post-installation
> >   script. It does not modify the package, it make just its installation
> >   successful at once, as it sould be.
> 
> That's still a modification. :-)
> 
> > > (Looking at the bug log, I can see that you were pointed to
> > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable ; this clearly indicates that any uploads to stable should be discussed on -release first.)
> > 
> > I must apologize: I thought that only a notification was required. Next 
> > time I shall begin a true discussion before submitting the package.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Adam
> 
> 



Reply to: