Bug#655912: transition: libupnp3 -> libupnp6
- To: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 655912@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Nick Leverton <nick@leverton.org>
- Subject: Bug#655912: transition: libupnp3 -> libupnp6
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 01:13:19 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120501231309.GZ31090@radis.cristau.org>
- Reply-to: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, 655912@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1335717864.4844.87.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- References: <20120205222658.GD14663@mraw.org> <20120205225412.GA7143@leverton.org> <20120216233631.GG30559@mraw.org> <20120225145732.GC778@mraw.org> <20120303230341.GA7452@mraw.org> <20120312205253.GG3628@radis.cristau.org> <20120312230414.GA25114@leverton.org> <20120324212441.GN22243@radis.cristau.org> <20120330105705.GA32066@leverton.org> <1335717864.4844.87.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 17:44:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> tag 655912 + pending
> thanks
>
> On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 11:57 +0100, Nick Leverton wrote:
> > Sorry for delay, I had a bug on the transition from one of my
> > dependencies, and have been away+offline much of the last two weeks.
> > Both problems should be sorted this weekend though - will get onto it
> > as soon as I'm back home!
>
> The new version of libupnp made it out of NEW in the past few days.
> It's now built everywhere except kfreebsd-i386 so I'm looking at
> binNMUing the reverse-dependencies.
>
So, hrm. Why do libupnp{3,6} ship multiple libraries with
non-synchronized SONAMEs in a single binary package? That means they
have to conflict, which is very much suboptimal.
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: