Bug#666889: transition: GNOME 3.4: clutter/cogl
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 17:25 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 29.04.2012 17:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 09:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> for GNOME 3.4, we need newer clutter-1.0 and cogl versions:
> > [...]
> >> Packages which need sourceful uploads:
> >> ======================================
> >> mutter (3.2.2-2 from exp)
> >
> > Will that resolve #669441?
>
> Yes, the version from experimental fixes this build failure (by not
> building with -Werror).
>
> >> Packages which can be binNMUed:
> >> ===============================
> >> gnome-shell
> >
> > Appears to FTBFS on arm{el,hf} currently; there's also #670097.
>
> The FTBFS on arm is something I wasn't aware of and seem to be caused by
> recent changes in the X/GL packages, it seems.
> Will have a look and poke Rico about that.
>
> Regarding #670097, the bug report lacks detail, so it might be a driver
> issue an it's most likely not specific to 3.2.2.1-3, i.e. the testing
> version would be affected too.
>
> That said, I'll follow up on the bug report to get some more useful
> information.
>
> > These three aren't on the tracker:
> >
> >> gnome-control-center
> >> eog-plugins
> >> gnome-games
> >
> > Is that an issue with the tracker criteria, or how the list of checked
> > packages was produced?
>
> eog-plugins, gnome-games: b-depend on libclutter-gtk-1.0-dev
> So the ben file should include that in affected.
>
> gnome-control-center: I'm not quite sure about this one.
> It build-depends on libcheese-gtk-dev which has
> Requires.private: clutter-gtk-1.0.
> But this doesn't result in a dependency on libcogl5. So I don't know why
> Sjoerd included g-c-c in that list.
> @Sjoerd: can you answer this question?
That's a while ago, not sure anymore tbh. I *suspect*
gnome-control-center isn't necessary anymore now that
gnome-control-center has been rebuild against a newer version of cheese
(which was done after i filed the bugreport).
--
Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@luon.net>
Reply to: