Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2012, 11:01 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On 11.04.2012 10:30, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > The current state is that M-A: same packages must have the same > > version > > and identical Changelog files across all architectures. That means > > binNMU on all architectures or a sourcefull upload. > > A source upload isn't "just a rebuild" in Debian. It's an NMU and > requires building and testing the package with at least as much care as > any other NMU would. It doesn't scale, it's a waste of resources and > I'm not convinced that it's something that it's appropriate for the > Release Team to be doing on a regular basis. while I agree with your other points, I wonder why doing a sourceful upload without source changes, built in a clean environment such as pbuilder, should require more testing than scheduling binNMUs, i.e. none? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part