[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#663531: marked as done (nmu: mupen64plus-video-z64_1.99.4+29+901fe271524a-1 [experimental])



Your message dated Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:41:00 +0000
with message-id <1332625260.12559.1.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#663531: nmu: mupen64plus-video-z64_1.99.4+29+901fe271524a-1 [experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #663531,
regarding nmu: mupen64plus-video-z64_1.99.4+29+901fe271524a-1 [experimental]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
663531: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663531
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu mupen64plus-video-z64_1.99.4+29+901fe271524a-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libglew1.7" -d experimental

mupen64plus-video-z64/experimental is no longer installable as it
depends on the no longer available libglew1.6.
It rebuilds and installs flawlessly in a current sid+experimental
chroot.


Andreas



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 01:49 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> nmu mupen64plus-video-z64_1.99.4+29+901fe271524a-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libglew1.7" -d experimental
> 
> mupen64plus-video-z64/experimental is no longer installable as it
> depends on the no longer available libglew1.6.
> It rebuilds and installs flawlessly in a current sid+experimental
> chroot.

The package has been removed from experimental as it's been superseded
by a new version in unstable; closing.

Regards,

Adam



--- End Message ---

Reply to: