On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 16:28:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these > > > didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready. > > > > > mumps and hdf5 have now transitioned. For petsc/slepc, they either need > > to build again on armel and kfreebsd-*, or the out of date binaries on > > those architectures need to be removed, by filing a bug against the > > ftp.debian.org pseudo-package. > > The bug against ftp.debian.org has been filed and closed (661936), but > petsc and slepc and their reverse-depends have not transitioned. > > What more needs to happen? I see a transition page for slepc at > http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/slepc.html , does feel++ need > to build for any of these other packages to go in? > The bug you reference seems to be about petsc. slepc has the same issue. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature