[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#697009: marked as done (nmu: tsung_1.4.2-1)

Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:28:21 +0100
with message-id <20121230192821.GA5634@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697009: nmu: tsung_1.4.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #697009,
regarding nmu: tsung_1.4.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
697009: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697009
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu tsung_1.4.2-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against newer erlang."

Hi,

tsung actually has a RC bug for this http://bugs.debian.org/695284

Rebuilding it solves the problem.

Thank you so much for your attention.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_CO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_CO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 14:20:28 -0500, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu tsung_1.4.2-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against newer erlang."
> 
> Hi,
> 
> tsung actually has a RC bug for this http://bugs.debian.org/695284
> 
> Rebuilding it solves the problem.
> 
NAK.  If tsung breaks when the erlang version changes, it either needs
to stop doing that or it needs to express that fact in its Depends
field.  Either way a binNMU is not the way to go IMO.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: