[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#696819: marked as done (unblock: nwchem/6.1-6)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:52:53 +0000
with message-id <1356634373.15533.1.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#696819: unblock: nwchem/6.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #696819,
regarding unblock: nwchem/6.1-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
696819: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696819
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package nwchem.  This upload fixes #696349, which
unfortunately escaped us in the -4/-5 upload as the limited test suite
we run during package build did not expose the issue.  The bug got fixed
upstream in the patch introduced in nwchem_6.1-4, but it required an
additional preprocessor define to actually get compiled which we have
now added in nwchem_6.1-6.

As the mips build for (the already unblocked, see #690482) nwchem_6.1-5
was still missing anyway[1], I went ahead and uploaded nwchem_6.1-6 to
unstable, please unblock.  The debdiff is rather minimal and attached:

 changelog                       |    7 +++++++
 patches/02_makefile_flags.patch |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


Many thanks,

Michael

[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=nwchem&arch=mips

diff -Nru nwchem-6.1/debian/changelog nwchem-6.1/debian/changelog
--- nwchem-6.1/debian/changelog	2012-12-14 14:44:25.000000000 +0100
+++ nwchem-6.1/debian/changelog	2012-12-25 22:07:21.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+nwchem (6.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/patches/02_makefile_flags.patch: Add GCC46 to defines (Closes:
+    #696349).
+
+ -- Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>  Tue, 25 Dec 2012 22:07:17 +0100
+
 nwchem (6.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Reverted subversion revisions 3824, 3834 and 3876. 
diff -Nru nwchem-6.1/debian/patches/02_makefile_flags.patch nwchem-6.1/debian/patches/02_makefile_flags.patch
--- nwchem-6.1/debian/patches/02_makefile_flags.patch	2012-12-14 13:23:52.000000000 +0100
+++ nwchem-6.1/debian/patches/02_makefile_flags.patch	2012-12-16 14:32:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
  endif
  
 -  DEFINES = -DLINUX
-+  DEFINES = -DLINUX -DGCC4
++  DEFINES = -DLINUX -DGCC4 -DGCC46
 +  FOPTIONS   += -fno-second-underscore -Wall
 +  FOPTIONS   += -ffixed-line-length-72 -ffixed-form
 +  FOPTIMIZE  += -g -O2 
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
           endif
         endif
 -       DEFINES  += -DEXT_INT
-+       DEFINES  += -DEXT_INT -DGCC4
++       DEFINES  += -DEXT_INT -DGCC4 -DGCC46
    MAKEFLAGS = -j 1 --no-print-directory
 -     _CPU = $(shell uname -m  )
 +     _CPU_ = $(shell uname -m  )

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 18:16 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> Please unblock package nwchem.  This upload fixes #696349, which
> unfortunately escaped us in the -4/-5 upload as the limited test suite
> we run during package build did not expose the issue.  The bug got fixed
> upstream in the patch introduced in nwchem_6.1-4, but it required an
> additional preprocessor define to actually get compiled which we have
> now added in nwchem_6.1-6.

Already unblocked by Julien.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: