On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:36:53 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote: > > Le dimanche 25 novembre 2012 à 22:54 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 22:52:49 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > >> > >> > Le dimanche 25 novembre 2012 à 21:09 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > >> > > > Unless there's a particular reason m-a support in this package is a > >> > > > priority, I would prefer to defer that part. > >> > > > > >> > > Hrm. Seems like this has landed still with a package split in addition > >> > > to the RC bug fix. Why? > >> > > >> > The package split *is* the RC bug fix. > >> > > >> The changelog suggests the RC bug fix is splitting out accessibility > >> stuff. There seems to be another new package, with no other > >> justification than "lintian". That is the one I'm questioning. > > > > Ah sorry, I didn’t parse your sentence correctly. > > > > Indeed this split is among the “good to have” stuff but was certainly > > not worth breaking the freeze. > > Actually, my intention was to do the split more completely. > So, I took the lintian warning as the indicator of my incompleteness. > > And I thought there was no objection from the several reviews. > So, I still kept it. > > Do you want me to undo it by another upload? > One further issue with this split: the gnome-themes-standard.mo files in /usr/share/locale are gone, as far as I can tell. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature