Bug#692135: unblock: whohas/0.29-0.2
Hi Adam,
thanks for looking into it:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> --- whohas-0.29/debian/patches/10-debian-versions 2012-01-15 18:21:29.000000000 +0000
> +++ whohas-0.29/debian/patches/10-debian-versions 2012-09-27 14:12:02.000000000 +0000
> @@ -1,16 +1,26 @@
> +From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
> +Subject: Fetch all versions from the same page for Debian
> +
> +Similarly to Ubuntu's logic supplied in the previous patch -- fetch all version
> Referring simply to "the previous patch" seems somewhat odd here -
would this change be sufficient?
-Similarly to Ubuntu's logic supplied in the previous patch -- fetch all version
+Similarly to Ubuntu's logic supplied in 06-ubuntu-versions patch -- fetch all version
> there's no guarantee the patch in question will even be in the package
> at any future point, yet alone be the "previous" patch.
IIRC if 06-ubuntu-versions gets dropped, 'all' logic would not be implemented,
thus 10-debian-versions would get broken. Therefore I am not expecting
10-debian-versions to exist without 06-ubuntu-versions (it is also unlikely for
upstream to adopt one without another).
> The meta-data is also now wrong:
> ## Description: Add unstable and experimental Debian repositories.
> ## Origin/Author: Jonathan Wiltshire <debian@jwiltshire.org.uk>
> ## Bug: https://bugs.debian.org/511364
indeed -- removed
> Unblocked, but I wouldn't be entirely averse to an update fixing the
> headers.
if above change is ok with you (if not -- feel free to elaborate or provide
your wording) -- I could upload adjusted -0.3 to sid
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
Reply to: